Jump to content

Le Céleste - 5 étages


ça coute cher
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, ça coute cher said:

2 tour residentielles de 116 et 110 unités.

1 commerce au RDC.

nombre d étages ??

voir avis public.

Je ne crois pas que ça puisse dépasser les 6 ou 8 étages dans ce secteur, mais je n'aurais rien contre le fait d'être contredit! ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Il y a 10 heures, FrancSoisD a dit :

Je ne crois pas que ça puisse dépasser les 6 ou 8 étages dans ce secteur, mais je n'aurais rien contre le fait d'être contredit! ;)

Je crois que le plan d'urbanisme permet jusqu'a 10 étages mais il y a certains secteurs qui permettent jusqu'a 15 étages. C'est soit 10, 12 ou 15.....Le boulevard Newman, Shevchenko et Dollard on vu les hauteurs permises revue a la hausse ainsi que le quadrilatère entre Champlain, Bishop-power, George et Gagné.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

October 10th 2019

At first I was convinced this would be a continuation of the La Vie project on George. They have built, are after, 108 "logements" on George between 11th and 16th avenue. But now, over 200 dwellings from the IGA to the Couche-Tard? Yeah, we're talking 8-10 floors here.

Now here's something weird. The public notice mentions Lot Number 6 278 915 at the corner of Gagne/George, but that lot doesn't exist at all! Instead it is 5 429 021. Worse, no mention is made of lot 6 231 048 which cuts right in the middle.

IMG_20191005_121935.jpg

IMG_20191005_121952.jpg

infolot.jpg

pdfav27602.pdf

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, denpanosekai said:

October 10th 2019

At first I was convinced this would be a continuation of the La Vie project on George. They have built, are after, 108 "logements" on George between 11th and 16th avenue. But now, over 200 dwellings from the IGA to the Couche-Tard? Yeah, we're talking 8-10 floors here.

Now here's something weird. The public notice mentions Lot Number 6 278 915 at the corner of Gagne/George, but that lot doesn't exist at all! Instead it is 5 429 021. Worse, no mention is made of lot 6 231 048 which cuts right in the middle.

 

 

 

pdfav27602.pdf 19.01 kB · 0 downloads

It's possible that the CT lot and 6 231 048 were merged and formed into a new lot, 6 278 915, but the castadre map hasn't been updated yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Kotar said:

It's possible that the CT lot and 6 231 048 were merged and formed into a new lot, 6 278 915, but the castadre map hasn't been updated yet.

The maps are updated daily on the Infolot website, for as long as municipal instances communicate the data to the govt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...