Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The Shopping Mall Turns 60 (and Prepares to Retire)

 

The Atlantic Cities

EMILY BADGER JUL 13, 2012

 

The enclosed suburban shopping mall has become so synonymous with the American landscape that it’s hard to imagine the original idea for it ever springing from some particular person's imagination. Now the scheme seems obvious: of course Americans want to amble indoors in a million square feet of air-conditioned retail, of course we will need a food court because so much shopping can’t be done without meal breaks, and of course we will require 10,000 parking spaces ringing the whole thing to accommodate all our cars.

 

The classic indoor mall, however, is widely credited with having an inventor. And when the Vienna-born architect Victor Gruen first outlined his vision for it in a 1952 article in the magazine Progressive Architecture, the plan was a shocker. Most Americans were still shopping downtown, and suburban "shopping centers," to the extent they existed, were most definitely not enclosed in indoor mega-destinations.

 

At the mall’s peak popularity, in 1990, America opened 19 of them. But we haven’t cut the ribbon on a new one since 2006.

 

Gruen’s idea transformed American consumption patterns and much of the environment around us. At age 60, however, the enclosed regional shopping mall also appears to be an idea that has run its course (OK, maybe not in China, but among Gruen’s original clientele). He opened the first prototype in Edina, Minnesota, in 1956, and the concept spread from there (this also means the earliest examples of the archetypal American mall are now of age for historic designation, if anyone wants to make that argument).

 

At the mall’s peak popularity, in 1990, America opened 19 of them. But we haven’t cut the ribbon on a new one since 2006, for reasons that go beyond the recession. As we imagine ways to repurpose these aging monoliths and what the next generation of retail should look like, it’s worth recalling Gruen’s odd legacy. He hated suburbia. He thought his ideas would revitalize cities. He wanted to bring urban density to the suburbs. And he envisioned shopping malls as our best chance at containing sprawl.

 

"He said great quotes on suburbia being 'soulless' and 'in search of a heart,'" says Jeff Hardwick, who wrote the Gruen biography Mall Maker. "He just goes on and on with these critiques. And they occur really early in his writing as well. So it’s not as if he ends up bemoaning suburbia later. He’s critiquing suburbia pretty much from the get-go, and of course the remedy he offers is the shopping mall."

 

Gruen wanted to create better versions of the American downtown in the suburbs. He wanted these places to be civic centers as much as commercial ones, with day cares, libraries, post offices, community halls and public art. He wanted the shopping mall to be for suburbia what the public square was to old European cities. In fact, that mall in Edina, called Southdale, was supposed to be the centerpiece of a 500-acre master plan to include houses, apartments, office buildings, a medical center and schools.

 

In his book, Hardwick unearths a great quote from the president of Dayton’s, the downtown Minneapolis department store that developed Southdale. He, like Gruen, believed that all of this could happen at no expense to the city.

 

"We do not believe," he said, "we or anybody else will lose any business because of the suburban move."

 

• • • • •

 

Gruen’s creations did an amazing job of luring customers (and holding them captive in the shopping bliss now known as the Gruen Effect). The day Southdale opened, 75,000 happy shoppers streamed in. And it’s hard to imagine now where Gruen thought these people were coming from, if not in an exodus from downtown.

 

He also built a series of satellite shopping centers around Detroit for the department store J.L. Hudson. When the first of them opened in 1954, Detroit was the fifth largest city in the country and the fastest growing in the East or Midwest. Of course Gruen’s shopping centers aren’t solely to blame for Detroit’s decline. But his idea helped set off a chain reaction that recurred in cities everywhere. Suburban malls drew consumers who found shopping and parking in the city too difficult. They contributed to a boom in development that enabled not just shopping dollars, but whole households to relocate to suburbia. Cities, eying this exodus, tore down buildings and tried unsuccessfully to recreate the ease of parking and the shopping experience people found in the suburbs. And this only further hastened their decline.

 

"Gruen will often go on about how they’re going to push each other, 'what we’ve created in the suburbs can now be a model for downtown,'" Hardwick says. "But he doesn’t imagine that what we created in the suburbs is going to bankrupt downtown."

 

In Edina, those plans for a whole town anchored around the mall were never executed, and perhaps Gruen was naïve to think the developers of shopping malls would also be interested in developing entire communities. At the time, Gruen believed that by locating all of a community’s shopping needs in an enclosed mall, with a nondescript exterior, we could do away with the "commercial blight" of scattered hot-dog stands and gas stations and neon storefronts that made America, in his eyes, so ugly.

 

But the property value around Southdale quickly went up. And instead of developing the full 500-acre site, Dayton’s sold off chunks of it for what would become the kind of "anonymous mass housing" Gruen detested, and precisely more of the commercial sprawl he wanted to eradicate. Repeatedly, his plans did not turn out as he had imagined them, and later in life he bitterly lamented that Americans had debased his ideas.

 

In one of the strangest legacies of his career, just as he was building these suburban shopping malls, Gruen was trying to revitalize urban downtowns with pedestrian-friendly master plans for cities like Fort Worth, Texas, and Kalamazoo, Michigan. He wanted to bring people back into the city even as he was trying to bring city-like amenities to the suburbs that lured so many people away.

 

"They’re totally at odds," Hardwick says. "He never is able to explain that, or justify it. It’s a fundamental contradiction of his career."

 

And then there was the problem in the suburbs of all that mall parking. How do you make a mall the civic heart of a community when it is, by definition, isolated in a sea of asphalt?

 

"Even if we had realized Gruen’s ideas," says Georgia Tech professor Ellen Dunham-Jones, "if it’s just this self-contained pod surrounded by berms that you drive to, I don’t think the suburbs would actually look or function all that differently [today]."

 

• • • • •

 

By Dunham-Jones' count, today about a third of our existing malls are "dead" or dying. That’s not to say they’re mostly vacant. But they have dreadful sales per square foot. High-end dress stores have moved out, and tattoo parlors have replaced them – "things," Dunham-Jones says, "that would normally be considered way too déclassé for a mall."

 

About a third of our malls are still thriving, and those are the biggest, newest ones. But America is no longer building many new highways, which means we’ve stopped creating prime new locations for mall development. Some of the earliest amenities of the enclosed mall – air-conditioning! – no longer impress us. And the demographics of suburbia have changed dramatically. Malls draw the largest share of their customers from teenagers, and the baby boomers who largely populate suburbia no longer have teenagers at home.

 

For all these reasons, the suburban mall of Gruen’s plan appears to be victim of more than just the recession. Dunham-Jones, who has tracked this trend in her book Retrofitting Suburbia, estimates that more than 40 malls nationwide have been targeted for significant redevelopment. And she can count 29 that have already been repurposed, or that have construction underway.

 

In 2010, Columbus, Ohio, tore down the dead mall in its downtown for a park. Voorhees, New Jersey, demolished half of its dead mall, built a new main street and relocated its city hall into the remaining building. In Denver, eight of the area’s 13 regional malls now have plans for redevelopment. One of them, in suburban Lakewood, was converted from a 100-acre super block into 22 walkable blocks with retail and residences.

 

"It’s the downtown that Lakewood never had before," Dunham-Jones says. Ironically, this is what Gruen had been aiming for. "Except that now it’s open-air."

 

Americans haven’t particularly outgrown the consumer impulse that Gruen detected. We still love to flock to dense agglomerations of Body Shops and Cinnabuns and Brookstones. But now those places look increasingly like open-air "lifestyle centers," with condos above or offices next door. Some of these places are just the old mall in a new Main Street disguise. But when you add residences, and cut Gruen’s mega-block into what actually looks like a downtown street grid, that begins to change things.

 

"You’ve got to get a mix of uses, but the connectivity is probably even more important," Dunham-Jones says. "The uses will come and go over time, but if you can establish a walkable network of streets, that’s when you’re really going to establish a ripple effect in changing suburban patterns."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not really if they are being replaced by power centres.

 

I include "power centres" in my everyday definition of shopping mall. Dix30 would be a good example.

 

It's interesting to note that dying "power centres" are generally easier to retrofit than traditional malls, due to the the physical layouts of the buildings, but ultimately they're just as problematic as their predecessors. In many cases, they're even more automobile dependent. In a typical mall, you can walk to the entrance then shop around inside at your convenience. In "power centres" such as Dix30, you would have to walk across a vast sea of parking lots to hop from store to store. It's a definitely a step down in that regard. Even the classic Strip Mall was superior form an urban standpoint.

 

Good riddance to all of these!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I include "power centres" in my everyday definition of shopping mall. Dix30 would be a good example.

 

It's interesting to note that dying "power centres" are generally easier to retrofit than traditional malls, due to the the physical layouts of the buildings, but ultimately they're just as problematic as their predecessors. In many cases, they're even more automobile dependent. In a typical mall, you can walk to the entrance then shop around inside at your convenience. In "power centres" such as Dix30, you would have to walk across a vast sea of parking lots to hop from store to store. It's a definitely a step down in that regard. Even the classic Strip Mall was superior form an urban standpoint.

 

Good riddance to all of these!

Actually, classic shopping centres can be integrated into new denser developments (especially if their big parking are replaced by buildings and underground parking). Shopping centres are a destination for jobs and businesses and services, so you can build dense residential units around them and you have a big number of people living near those services (at walking distance). If you have a metro station or a bus terminal close by, people living there can reach downtown or other job centres without cars. Carrefour Angrignon is a good example for that. There's been some small towers built near the Galeries d'Anjou, and if the Blue line is extended there, we could see more developments (there are a lot of parking lots). Carrefour Laval and Centre Laval can be a big part of the developing Laval downtown. Shopping centres have the potential to become local downtown with denser residential areas and people around gathering for shopping and going out. Not everybody wants to go downtown.

 

And shopping centres are a good way for people without air conditioning to get cooler for free.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually, classic shopping centres can be integrated into new denser developments (especially if their big parking are replaced by buildings and underground parking). Shopping centres are a destination for jobs and businesses and services, so you can build dense residential units around them and you have a big number of people living near those services (at walking distance). If you have a metro station or a bus terminal close by, people living there can reach downtown or other job centres without cars. Carrefour Angrignon is a good example for that. There's been some small towers built near the Galeries d'Anjou, and if the Blue line is extended there, we could see more developments (there are a lot of parking lots). Carrefour Laval and Centre Laval can be a big part of the developing Laval downtown. Shopping centres have the potential to become local downtown with denser residential areas and people around gathering for shopping and going out. Not everybody wants to go downtown.

 

And shopping centres are a good way for people without air conditioning to get cooler for free.

 

Of course malls can be can be converted. That's what I'm saying. Did you read my post? lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course malls can be can be converted. That's what I'm saying. Did you read my post? lol

 

Yes, but you finished by: "Good riddance to all of these!". I don't want to get rid of classic malls, I want them to be integrated in new developments, as the heart of new developments. I want to built around them, not replace them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, but you finished by: "Good riddance to all of these!". I don't want to get rid of classic malls, I want them to be integrated in new developments, as the heart of new developments. I want to built around them, not replace them.

 

Who said bulldozing was the only option? There are a multitude of ways malls can be converted, reappropriated and modernized for better uses.

 

As an urban planner, you better believe I support shopping mall redevelopment! In fact, Place Longueuil next to the future metro station on the yellow line is an ideal candidate. But if you take your classic mall, build over the parking lots and stick a high-density residential tower or two over the main structure, then it's no longer a classic mall. It's something else. Hence, good riddance! ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rien n'est permanent dans ce bas-monde, tout se transforme et évolue. Les mentalités changent, les besoins aussi, les modes passent et l'ancien fait place au plus contemporain. On a essayé plusieurs formules de centres d'achats et maintenant on arrive plus près de l'idée d'un véritable centre où tout se concentre, converge. Bien sûr l'automobile est encore omniprésente dans l'équation et c'est le maillon qui fait encore problème, puisqu'il faut l'accommoder et qu'elle nécessite de grandes surfaces.

 

La plupart des plus gros centres, les régionaux, auront de la difficulté à se libérer de l'automobile car ils s'adressent à une clientèle largement dispersée, c'est leur raison d'être. Cependant les plus petits, peuvent plus aisément se reconvertir en densifiant la population tout autour, qui leur garantit un minimum d'achalandage. En plus, plus on réussira à développer des moyens de transports efficaces et confortables, qui relieront les quartiers limitrophes aux centres d'achats, plus on se libérera du véhicule individuel et de ses inconvénients. En contre-partie cependant, il faudra développer un service de livraison pratique qui pourra compenser une partie des avantages de l'automobile.

 

Quand on regarde l'évolution des centres d'achats, on les voit, au départ dans les années soixantes, s'éloigner des centres-villes, tuer plus ou moins ces centres-villes devenus déserts, puis lentement jusqu'à aujourd'hui devenir eux-même de minis centres-villes, par de nouvelles constructions en hauteur sur les sites mêmes. Bien sûr le mouvement est lent et inégal, mais la tendance pointe déjà à l'horizon et c'est tant mieux. On sera allé à l'extrême, au tout à l'automobile, pour adopter au passage une formule mixte, qui deviendra éventuellement un centre des villes peut-être un peu plus éclaté que les anciens.

 

En fait, l'élément essentiel pour la transformation de cette formule devenue obsolète, est la densité. Plus il y aura de population dans un périmètre donné, plus le transport en commun sera justifié et on l'organisera autour des véritables besoins de la clientèle. Tout le monde y gagnera au change: moins d'immenses parkings transformés en ilots de chaleur, moins de routes et autoroutes, moins de pollution et de gaz à effet de serre et moins de pertes de temps dans les bouchons, les jours de grands magasinages. Nos villes et leurs habitants ne s'en porteront que mieux.

 

On aura vu l'effet pervers de la multiplication des centres d'achats et combien ils ont contribué à l'étalement urbain. Maintenant dans un esprit de développement plus durable, on refait le chemin inverse où le collectif fera une concurrence plus saine à l'individualisme. Il ne s'agit pas ici d'interdire, mais plutôt de favoriser un équilibre en réinventant nos modes de vie, nos habitations et nos relations commerciales, où l'automobile ne servira plus nécessairement de trait d'union. Une des conséquences positives de ce mouvement, bien qu'en parallèle: on voit de plus en plus de marchés publics locaux permanents et provisoires dans le coeur des municipalités. Ils sont populaires autant par la variété des produits qu'ils offrent, que leur ambiance festive et le rapport simple entre vendeurs et acheteurs.

 

En fait les tendances évoluent et les modes changent, mais l'homme demeure un être grégaire qui aime les rassemblements et les échanges. Le commerce a toujours été un moteur d'évolution social et il semble maintenant revenir tranquillement à ses principes de base, après une révolution qui aura fait son temps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who said bulldozing was the only option? There are a multitude of ways malls can be converted, reappropriated and modernized for better uses.

 

As an urban planner, you better believe I support shopping mall redevelopment! In fact, Place Longueuil next to the future metro station on the yellow line is an ideal candidate. But if you take your classic mall, build over the parking lots and stick a high-density residential tower or two over the main structure, then it's no longer a classic mall. It's something else. Hence, good riddance! ;)

 

All right...

 

Shopping centres can be the cornerstone of new higher density in the subburbs. They make great public transportation hubs (especially when you can get the metro there)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...