Économie du Canada

[andre md]

Il y a 17 heures, mtlurb a dit :

 

Canada un pays surévalué, disont le bien franchement.

 

[raphi974]

Le 2024-04-30 à 03:41, andre md a dit :

Canada un pays surévalué, disont le bien franchement.

 

Surévalué, comment ça? Dans quelle mesure?

[mtlurb]

Wealth of nations

The world’s richest countries in 2024

Our annual ranking compares economies in three different ways

Online extra | Jul 4, 2024

 

SORTING COUNTRIES into rich and poor can be difficult. Measures such as GDP are affected by population size (more people generally mean more output). But adjusting for population alone is not enough. Dollar income per person does not account for differences in prices between countries (a Big Mac, for example, will set you back more in some places than in others, even after converting into dollars). Nor does it account for productivity (overall output per hour worked).

To get a fuller picture, The Economist therefore ranks countries by three measures: dollar income per person, income adjusted for local prices (known as purchasing-power parity, or PPP) and income per hour worked. See where each country ranks below.

Take America first. Its GDP has been the largest at market exchange rates for over a century. But by income per person it falls to sixth, behind Luxembourg (first) and Switzerland (second). Adjusting for America’s higher prices pushes it down to ninth; accounting for its long workdays and limited holidays, to tenth. The results for China—the world’s second-largest economy in nominal terms—are even starker: it falls to 69th by GDP per person, 75th at local prices and 97th after accounting for hours worked. Singapore and Brunei exhibit some of the biggest differences between each measure, and Macau, a special administrative region of China, had the biggest increase in GDP per person compared with last year.

 

 

GDP per person in Burundi is just $200 a year—the lowest of any country in the ranking. It remains in last place even after adjusting for its cheap prices and below-average working hours (almost half its people are under the age of 14). Sierra Leone or the Central African Republic comes next, depending on which measure is used. Poorer countries tend to have large informal economies, however, which makes their total output and working hours harder to gauge.

Our ranking excludes some tiny overseas territories, such as Bermuda. It also excludes Ireland, where GDP calculations are a bit odd. Other factors also affect our ranking: we only provide average GDP per person, for example, but differences between the highest and lowest earners can vary significantly. In some countries official data may be misleading. And factors such as savings rates, salaries earned abroad and personal assets are also missing from our data, and could skew personal-income results (read our full methodology here). Caveats aside, the index is designed to give a more complete assessment of the world’s richest countries than does a focus on any single measure.

[KOOL]

On n'arrive pas à voir sur le deuxième graphique, le Canada périclite de la 16ème place jusqu'à où dans les bas-fonds ? 

[mtlurb]

Il y a 1 heure, KOOL a dit :

On n'arrive pas à voir sur le deuxième graphique, le Canada périclite de la 16ème place jusqu'à où dans les bas-fonds ? 

Exact dans le bas fond... l'article est comme ça originalement lol

[Djentmaster001]

Wild how much Canada has plunged post covid with a Liberal-NDP government in power... such a bleak future if things don't turn around soon.

[mtlurb]

Il y a 7 heures, mtlurb a dit :

Wealth of nations

The world’s richest countries in 2024

Our annual ranking compares economies in three different ways

Online extra | Jul 4, 2024

 

SORTING COUNTRIES into rich and poor can be difficult. Measures such as GDP are affected by population size (more people generally mean more output). But adjusting for population alone is not enough. Dollar income per person does not account for differences in prices between countries (a Big Mac, for example, will set you back more in some places than in others, even after converting into dollars). Nor does it account for productivity (overall output per hour worked).

To get a fuller picture, The Economist therefore ranks countries by three measures: dollar income per person, income adjusted for local prices (known as purchasing-power parity, or PPP) and income per hour worked. See where each country ranks below.

Take America first. Its GDP has been the largest at market exchange rates for over a century. But by income per person it falls to sixth, behind Luxembourg (first) and Switzerland (second). Adjusting for America’s higher prices pushes it down to ninth; accounting for its long workdays and limited holidays, to tenth. The results for China—the world’s second-largest economy in nominal terms—are even starker: it falls to 69th by GDP per person, 75th at local prices and 97th after accounting for hours worked. Singapore and Brunei exhibit some of the biggest differences between each measure, and Macau, a special administrative region of China, had the biggest increase in GDP per person compared with last year.

 

 

GDP per person in Burundi is just $200 a year—the lowest of any country in the ranking. It remains in last place even after adjusting for its cheap prices and below-average working hours (almost half its people are under the age of 14). Sierra Leone or the Central African Republic comes next, depending on which measure is used. Poorer countries tend to have large informal economies, however, which makes their total output and working hours harder to gauge.

Our ranking excludes some tiny overseas territories, such as Bermuda. It also excludes Ireland, where GDP calculations are a bit odd. Other factors also affect our ranking: we only provide average GDP per person, for example, but differences between the highest and lowest earners can vary significantly. In some countries official data may be misleading. And factors such as savings rates, salaries earned abroad and personal assets are also missing from our data, and could skew personal-income results (read our full methodology here). Caveats aside, the index is designed to give a more complete assessment of the world’s richest countries than does a focus on any single measure.

Directement du site Economist... pas facile à utiliser ce graphique. (J'ai mis la France comme référence)

https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2024/07/04/the-worlds-richest-countries-in-2024

[jesseps]

On 2024-04-30 at 11:41 AM, andre md said:

Canada un pays surévalué, disont le bien franchement.

 

There is a channel that I watch once in a while on YouTube and the guy calls Canada a legacy brand. Canada is now a 3-star hotel, charging people like it is a 5-star hotel.

Canada has a lot to do to fix it's image.

[andre md]

Le 2024-07-10 à 03:46, jesseps a dit :

There is a channel that I watch once in a while on YouTube and the guy calls Canada a legacy brand. Canada is now a 3-star hotel, charging people like it is a 5-star hotel.

Canada has a lot to do to fix it's image.

I am used to watch latino immigration youtube channel. Canada was the dream place to go. Not anymore.

Trop cher , pas de job , trop de bureaucratie. 

Australie  dans une moindre mesure s'en va dans la meme direction. 

Ce qui nous sauve c'est que le Canada et l'Australie sont riches en ressources sinon ce serait game over. 

 

[mtlurb]