Aller au contenu
publicité

digitalfunkster

Membre
  • Compteur de contenus

    116
  • Inscription

  • Dernière visite

Messages posté(e)s par digitalfunkster

  1. Hey Cataclaw,

     

    I think I might be one of the only people who thinks that what you are saying makes a lot of sense.

     

    As someone who works in the sciences I can feel your pain. You are the only person here who is actually qualified to make a case, yet people who know nothing on these matters, who have not read the research, who have not run simulations, feel they know better. The world is often a shitty place because people go on their "gut feelings" rather than on rational, peer-reviewed research.

     

    Unless you are in favour of urban sprawl you might want to be listening to what Cataclaw has to say and being open to learn from someone, rather than spewing utter nonsense.

     

    My rant of the day.

  2. I live very close by and drive past it on Christophe Colomb every day. I think it is a pretty ugly building, especially the backside as seen in Steve_36's 3rd photo. The backside has like 5 diffferent ideas going on at the same time...not good. It's not a very pretty building, then again I don't think there are any nice buildings along the 40, so it will fit right in!

  3. Great architecture. It's unfortunate to see it wasted on a suburban office park, but good design nevertheless.

     

    Hey cataclaw, I am curious about one thing. I see you invoke the term suburb a lot. What constitutes the suburbs to you? I just get the feeling that you see downtown and the plateau to be "city" and the rest is suburbs. Please correct me if I am wrong. I ask because I have friends who lives downtown and they have this warped idea of what the suburbs are. A friend of mine see's Villeray as "way out there in the suburbs". this blows my mind. I'm just making sure I am not the one who is nuts.

  4. I agree with Gilbert on this one. This message board is oddly obsessed with tall buildings. I don't know why everyone thinks that taller = better? Like Gilbert says, almost no buildings even take advantage of the maximum height designated to their lot...so what does raising the limits do. There are plenty of properties to develop before we need to even think of raising the building heights. Tall buildings are cool, but we shouldn't have this inferiority complex because other cities have taller buildings. Let's work on having nicer, more interesting architecture. Also, if I had to make a list of interesting architecture in Montreal I would probably think of way more buildings under 20 storeys before I'd add one of our 30+ storey buildings to the list. Just sayin'...

  5. Really, if the Concordia area is "ghetto" then you have the highest standards I have ever seen. The area around Concordia really is kind of nice. I admit, things get a little less nice towards Atwater, but even then I would not consider it to be "ghetto". Have you been to other cities in North America? Montreal doesn't have ghettos....not compared to what else is out there!

  6. Cyrus,

     

    I suppose 40 years from now they will re-evaluate if more lanes are needed. At the end of the day it costs A LOT of money to build these roads. I imagine it is hard to justify over designing a road by 2 or 3 times to anticipate traffic 40 years down the road. Not only does it cost a lot more to way overdesign a road, it costs a lot more on an annual basis to maintain it all. I understand what you are saying, but I am just trying to be rational about this.

  7. Cyrus,

    You want potentially up to 10 lanes? Wow, talk about overkill! I have crossed the bridge maybe 10 or 15 times now for work-related reasons and every time I cross I am amazed how I am the only person on that stretch of road on the 25. Seriously! Last week I crossed the bridge at around 9am and there was hardly anyone on the road! I myself was even surprised when I saw during the construction phase that they were only going to built a 4 lane highway (2 lanes each way). Now that I have driven across multiple times I think it is fairly obvious that 2 lanes was all that was needed (obviously due to the tolls).

  8. Every time I pass by I'm always amazed at the number of condo towers located next to the mall,there must be over 20 buildings all about 15 floors all the same style, too bad they didn't build them at 30-40 storeys that would have an interesting sight to look at

     

    haha Once again I am baffled by this message boards blind obsession with height. The last thing I would want is that awful area of buildings to be taller. All it would do is make awful looking buildings be even more noticeably awful. I wish that area of the city would implode. It's everything that is wrong with the world in a tight little package.

  9. Lindberg, it is fine to say you don't like the design, but too often I hear people simply say something to the effect of "if it were only 10 storeys taller it would be nicer!". That is such bullshit. A building is either well designed or not, and adding 10 or 50 floors does not save a bad design, all it does is make the bad design more noticeable!

     

    To prove my point that height does not enhance design, just think of all the buildings in montreal that you think are architecturally very interesting. Now how many of those are one of the 20+ story buildings of the downtown core? Probably not that many.

     

    I am not against height by any means. There are many beautiful tall buildings, however I am just trying to restore some balance to this messageboard! :)

×
×
  • Créer...