Gjm127

54 minutes ago, Normand Hamel said:

Est-ce qu'on parle de ce coin-ci (voir photo) ou l'autre coin ou il y a/avait un Starbuck?

Ce coin. L'autre coin va rester le Starbucks.

Confirmé Kettleman Bagel au local du coin et La Belle et la Bœuf au local qui longe le côté.

21 hours ago, Rocco said:

Centris

Interesting how this view makes the 1250 look like it dominates over the rest of dt. 

https://www.journaldemontreal.com/2022/01/22/devimco-inquiete-pour-pointe-saint-charles

Some hope that if one day an opportunity presents itself again, the land may still be available... Glad to hear Devimco doesn't plan to build anything on that land in the near future. 

This Peel bassin was the only viable land left to build a stadium... And now it's going to be yet again, pretentious condo towers for foreign investment... 

So, we just drop everything? I wonder what Bronfman will do now. 

On 2021-12-14 at 8:36 AM, acpnc said:

Ce petit immeuble est à la fois un bijou d'art déco et un édifice à caractère patrimonial. Il mettra en valeur l'espace public futur dans lequel on pourrait peut-être organiser notamment des événements artistiques ponctuels et des expositions à la disposition des artistes du coin.  

ou des toilettes publiques qui servira le parc du Faubourg St. Ann en face...

Je fais cette hypothèse pessimiste vu qu'on a aucun plan/rendu pour cet édifice. 

9 hours ago, Spiter_01 said:

Whatever the pitch/business plan might be I find it highly implausible that a group of billionaire investors have it as their end goal to own a part of an MLB team. To me it's highly improbable that they, a group of highly successful and wealthy individual would embark in all of this without a pathway/plan for full ownership. Sure it might start off as a shared teamed but down the line whether it be 5-10-15 years the plan surely has to be full ownership. I can't remember in recent memory any minority investment into a sports team in NA or elsewhere that didn't include some buyout clause or plan for full takeover. 

If what's been said about a full-time team requiring a roof/domed stadium is correct then I would certainly expect a future stadium at peel bassin would include that from the start or the possibility for the addition of a roof in the design. The idea that 15-20 years from now Montreal and Tampa would still be sharing a team is one the most unlikely of all the scenarios, only second to Montreal getting a team full-time (after sharing it with TB) and embarking on an even newer stadium so they can have full-seasons here. 

Agreed. The design certainly will include the adaptability and expansion for a future roof. Bronfman doesn't have enough $ to finance a roof at the moment since it would add another ~$300M to the price tag. The roof would also be unused for 95% of the time since the team would only play here in summer so it's not much of a priority at the moment and cuts costs by a big bunch. This is actually somewhat the reason why we're splitting seasons and not relocating altogether, it comes down to financing the roof. If our investors were able to finance a full stadium witn roof, they'd be asking for full relocation. It wouldn't make sense otherwise, from an investment perspective. 

So as a transition, no roof is okay because the weather will allow for play outdoors during the split season and it also allows the investors to bring a team to town. Good compromise.

9 hours ago, anjou said:

Quelqu'un sait pourquoi il y a un couloir entre les deux zones 120m+ ? 

the dragons

1 hour ago, KOOL said:

MLB doesn't work like the NHL in this scenario. There is no way Bronfman will start building the stadium without a guarantee that they will host at least 41 home games per season. I think we have all learned from our mistakes and Bronfman is definitely aware of that. It's not like he's not chipping in a bunch of $ too.

5 minutes ago, Ti-Pierre said:

En 1962

Dat traffic on Dr. Penfield lol

On 2021-10-02 at 1:07 PM, Wave Arts said:

Le trou sera déjà rempli par le 900. 

Je crains qu'il va se trouver flush derrière le 1000. Étions sûres que le 900 sera entièrement visible à partir du Mont-Royal ?

33 minutes ago, Rocco said:

Banque Nationale + 900. Problem solved.

I feel like there will still be a hole lol

On 2021-09-21 at 12:59 AM, Rocco said:

Classic shots 21 septembre

 

 

 

 

That hole between the 1000 and PVM makes this the worst skyline vantage point in Montreale. I know I'm stating the obvious... But it pains me that every tourist, all marketing media footage about the city, every Google artifact returns photos from this point of view. It's unfortunate. 

Lol... Mais ça aurait put être tellememt dangereux cette gaffe.

On 2021-09-13 at 9:21 PM, Rocco said:

Awesome! Just how I envisioned it

Est-ce que c'est un lot commercial ou résidentiel ?

On 2021-08-27 at 1:17 AM, Dominic723 said:

Manquerait juste un petit powerwash

Des photos du toit? Est-ce la même chose? Je ne suis pas présentement à Montréal

Now the whole Marriott sign is gone. I hope they're installing nice LEDs around the circular roof, that would unique, recognizable and pretty cool.

J'ai remarqué ces derniers jours qu'il y a des nouvelles installations au niveau du toit où il y a le symbole de Marriott. 

Avez-vous une idée de ce qui se passe ? Installent-ils des DELs autour du toit ?

Est-ce que ce projet est mort ?

3 hours ago, Rocco said:

Maquette du bureau des ventes

Now it's clear to me what they make me think of... Conjoined identical twins.

.. Si ça c'est la "perle" de Devimco 😂