Recommended Posts

blog-header_6_blog_header.jpg

 

Many cities bum rush towards bankruptcy, raising taxes instead of cutting spending, but one city – Colorado Springs – has drawn the line. When sales tax revenues dropped, voters were asked to make up the shortfall by tripling their property taxes. Voters emphatically said no, despite the threat of reduced services. Those cuts have now arrived.

 

More than a third of the streetlights in Colorado Springs will go dark Monday. The police helicopters are for sale on the Internet. The city is dumping firefighting jobs, a vice team, burglary investigators, beat cops — dozens of police and fire positions will go unfilled.

 

The parks department removed trash cans last week, replacing them with signs urging users to pack out their own litter.

 

Neighbors are encouraged to bring their own lawn mowers to local green spaces, because parks workers will mow them only once every two weeks…

City recreation centers, indoor and outdoor pools, and a handful of museums will close for good March 31 unless they find private funding to stay open.

I bet they do find private funding. That and community involvement is a better solution than throwing more money to government bureaucrats. A private enterprise task force is focusing on the real problem; the city’s soaring pension and health care costs for city employees.

 

Broadmoor luxury resort chief executive Steve Bartolin wrote an open letter asking why the city spends $89,000 per employee, when his enterprise has a similar number of workers and spends only $24,000 on each.

Good question, and also the subject of my Fox Business Network show tonight. Government employee unions are a big reason cities spend themselves into bankruptcy. Some union workers in Colorado Springs make it clear that they are not volunteering to help solve the budget problems.

 

(A) small fraction of city employees have made perfectly clear they won’t stand for pay cuts, no matter what happens to the people who pay their wages. The attitude of a loud minority of employees, toward local taxpayers, sometimes sounds like “(expletive) them.”

 

Maybe those workers should sense change in the air. Colorado Springs residents understand that if you can’t pay for it, you can’t have it. And if a rec center has to be closed, or the cops lose their helicopters, or government workers get a pay cut, so be it.

 

 

Read more: http://stossel.blogs.foxbusiness.com/2010/02/11/colorado-springs-walks-the-walk/#ixzz0fH4d5Mpd

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't really care for Stossel's hard-right libertarian views, but on this issue i have to say i'm in full agreement.

 

Raising taxes CAN be a beneficial thing, if the circumstances are right. But before raising taxes, all possible efficient cuts should be explored. This is especially a problem in Quebec. There are a lot of things we could trim (without even affecting quality of life!) in this province. Before raising any tax, let's explore those options. If and only if those options are not fruitful... then we can consider raising taxes!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Stossel is the man! I really wish I could watch his Fox Business show tonight, but, Videotron doesn't carry that channel... :rolleyes:

 

You can watch all his shows on therightscoop.com within an hour or two of airing...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I don't really care for Stossel's hard-right libertarian views, but on this issue i have to say i'm in full agreement.

 

Raising taxes CAN be a beneficial thing, if the circumstances are right. But before raising taxes, all possible efficient cuts should be explored. This is especially a problem in Quebec. There are a lot of things we could trim (without even affecting quality of life!) in this province. Before raising any tax, let's explore those options. If and only if those options are not fruitful... then we can consider raising taxes!

 

I don't know if I would say that he's hard right... He's for legalizing drugs, gay marriage, etc. He's actually very liberal (left) on social issues and very libertarian (right) on fiscal issues. We need to not confuse authoritarian right with libertarian right... the purple box below is where I see myself and I'm sure Stossel would fit in there too.

 

usprimaries_2008.png

 

It's kind of weird to see Obama where he is, I imagined him in the red box for sure. Maybe this graph needs updating after a year in power. Also, I would've thought Ron Paul would have been lower into the purple box...

 

btw, if you want to take the political compass test for yourself, you can go to http://www.politicalcompass.org

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i liked the comment they made on the the show 'the hour' last night on this, in that as they tried to stick it to the man & revolt against perceived 'socialism', they really created a communist utopia.

 

think of it - not even any taxes: people paying right out of their own pockets for services geared towards the greater good.

 

 

kinda like if all U.S. doctors revolted against the healthcare reform plan by offering their services for free ..

 

weird neighbors we have sometimes i tell ya ......

 

 

 

:rolleyes:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's kind of weird to see Obama where he is, I imagined him in the red box for sure. Maybe this graph needs updating after a year in power. Also, I would've thought Ron Paul would have been lower into the purple box...

 

 

 

 

very few american politicians are actually left; our own canadian conservatives would probably even fall more to the left than the american democratic party for a good number of their policies. .. !

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
very few american politicians are actually left; our own canadian conservatives would probably even fall more to the left than the american democratic party for a good number of their policies. .. !

 

Well, when the government is bailing out companies and buying car companies, I don't know how much more do you need to do before you fall into the left quadrant. As far as I'm concerned, people like Bush and Mccain should be much closer to the vertical line dividing left and right.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Raising taxes CAN be a beneficial thing, if the circumstances are right. But before raising taxes, all possible efficient cuts should be explored. This is especially a problem in Quebec. There are a lot of things we could trim (without even affecting quality of life!) in this province. Before raising any tax, let's explore those options. If and only if those options are not fruitful... then we can consider raising taxes!

 

I'm really starting to question myself why do you even bother?? Nothing will ever change in this province. WE are ultra liberals when it comes to everything, no matter how much change you think we as a society need, it ain't gonna happen.

 

Too many bums in this province don't pay any taxes at all...do you honestly think that these people would want to see all their free services taken away? Fvck No! They don't contribute anything to our society, yet they hold the rest of us(the actual tax payers) down, and they voting against any changes to the way our gov't spends its money!

 

I'm getting more and more disillusioned as the years go by. Il y a trop de profiteurs dans cette province, et rien ne va changer dans un futur rapproché.

Edited by Habsfan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
i liked the comment they made on the the show 'the hour' last night on this, in that as they tried to stick it to the man & revolt against perceived 'socialism', they really created a communist utopia.

 

think of it - not even any taxes: people paying right out of their own pockets for services geared towards the greater good.

 

 

kinda like if all U.S. doctors revolted against the healthcare reform plan by offering their services for free ..

 

weird neighbors we have sometimes i tell ya ......

 

 

 

:rolleyes:

 

You know, it's really not like socialism or communism. In a free-market capitalist country, people take and share responsibility instead of depending on others to provide everything (and paying astronomical amounts to get the work done by inefficient and overpaid blue collar workers).

 

Socialism and communism is imposed on you, whereas, in this case, nobody forced anybody to mow the lawn of the park and nobody forced you to pay for it either.

 

Further, lots of doctors would be generous and offer free health care (like it was in the past) if the government wasn't there. The government, in an idealist need to take care of everything and everyone, actually does a lot of harm and makes people self-centered, un-generous, and un-helping, destroying any kind of community there would be if government didn't get involved.

 

Instead of having government waste all our money on it's awful choices, why not give that power back to the people? I'm sure people would organize and spend only on what they thought was really necessary.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Similar Content

    • By IluvMTL
      http://montreal.citiesforpeople.ca/
       
      Photo: Martha Wainwright by Cindy Boyce   As Montréal was getting ready to celebrate its 375th anniversary, we wanted to reflect on its past, its present, and its future.
      Bringing together a team of writers, historians, thinkers, photographers and illustrators, we asked them to give us their visions of this complex city, both international and parochial, proud of its glorious past but sometimes weighted down by it, stimulating and often infuriating, but always, from the very start, rich in stories.
        THE MAD ADVENTURE   TOWARD A NEW COLLECTIVE NARRATIVE FOR MONTRÉAL   375 YEARS OF MONTRÉAL HISTORY, IN FOUR PARTS   SNAPSHOTS   MONTRÉAL: THE CITY THAT COULD HAVE BEEN   GLIMPSES OF PARK EX   LITERARY CARTOGRAPHY   MONTRÉAL'S EXTREMITIES   ON THE MONTREALISATION OF FRENCH MIGRANTS Download the entire magazine as PDF Nouveau Projet
      Nouveau Projet is a general-interest biannual publication launched in Montréal in 2012. It aims to offer Quebecers a high-quality magazine that showcases the best writers, thinkers, and visual artists. It supports progressive forces at the social and cultural levels, and seeks to contribute to a dynamic and creative society. It has received many awards over the years, including the Canadian Magazine of the Year title at the National Magazine Awards in 2015.
      Cities for people Cities for People is an initiative of the J.W. McConnell Family Foundation that aims to foster more inclusive, innovative and resilient cities across Canada. Following an experimental phase, in 2016 we have refocused our efforts on four priorities: 1) Increasing Equality, 2) Strengthening the Civic Commons, 3) Enabling City Labs, and 4) Supporting Urban Innovation Networks.
      Amplifier Montréal Amplifier Montréal is a movement launched by several partners from various backgrounds in the city of Montreal to influence the city's ongoing transformation. The goal is to rethink the way we see ourselves and the way we should go about transforming Montréal into a more inclusive, resilient and innovative city. We achieve this by listening to all, particularly those who voices are unheard, in order to collect and promote the diversity of cities’ narratives, and by making a call for action through unlikely collaborations between various stakeholders.
      The J.W. McConnell Family Foundation Established in 1937, the J.W. McConnell Family Foundation engages Canadians in building a more innovative, inclusive, sustainable, and resilient society. The Foundation’s purpose is to enhance Canada’s ability to address complex social, environmental and economic challenges. We accomplish this by developing, testing, and applying innovative approaches and solutions; by strengthening the community sector; and by collaborating with partners in the community, private, and public sectors. We recognize that creating enduring change takes time, and involves more than granting.
    • By ErickMontreal
      STM plans to build solar-powered bus shelters
      Panels could be used to power lighting * and illuminate revenue-producing ads

      By Monique Beaudin, The GazetteFebruary 2, 2009
       
      Montreal’s public-transit agency is planning to spend $14.4 million to buy 400 new bus shelters – some of which would use solar panels to provide electricity.
       
      The new shelters need an energy source to allow the Société de transport de Montréal to use new tools to provide customer service and advertising.
       
      In some cases the shelters would be powered by solar energy, in others the shelters would be linked into a local source of electricity.
       
      Several other cities – including London, Vancouver and Toronto – already have bus shelters that use solar panels to charge batteries that power their lighting systems. Blainville, north of Mont-real, put up four such shelters in October and plans to replace all its bus shelters with solar-powered ones by 2010, said spokesperson Yves Meunier.
       
      Blainville’s plan was to make their bus shelters self-financing, by using revenue generated from selling advertising in the shelters. For that they needed an energy source to illuminate the ads.
       
      “People selling advertising want the ads to be visible for a certain number of hours every day, especially during the winter,” Meunier said.
       
      Blainville’s bus shelters – which cost about $30,000 each – were designed and built by a local firm, Meunier said. The city will recycle the old shelters by selling them to other municipalities, he added.
       
      The STM also expects that by selling ad space in its new shelters they’ll pay for themselves over a 10-year period.
       
      While the STM has already tested several different kinds of solar-powered bus shelters, spokesperson Isabelle Tremblay said the agency hasn’t chosen a specific bus shelter model to buy yet.
       
      The transit agency is still waiting for the results of a bus-shelter design contest announced by Montreal Mayor Gérald Tremblay last September.
       
      Tremblay called on the city’s designers to come up with new ideas for five things – the Champs de Mars métro station, the eastern wall of the courthouse, bus shelters, taxis and temporary festival furniture.
       
      Design Montreal has not yet launched the contest, spokesperson Stéphanie Jecrois said yesterday.
       
      The agency is still meeting with its partners to determine how the contest will work, but she said the contest details should be announced with a few weeks. The contest will be held in 2009, she said.
       
      Meanwhile, at the STM, Tremblay said the agency will only go to tender for new bus shelters after the Design Montreal contest wraps up.
       
      The STM now has 2,977 bus shelters, serving about one-third of its bus stops. It would like to install 100 new bus shelters over the next two years, and 100 more each year from 2011 to 2013.
       
      [email protected]
      © Copyright © The Montreal Gazette
    • By jesseps
      Thanks to GDS for the folowing :
       
    • By jesseps
      (Courtesy of The Montreal Gazette)
       

    • By slanctot
      Nouveau projet Accès condo à Lachine - Mise en vente le 12 mars 2011
       
      120 unités, réparties sur 6 étages
       
      1cc à partir de
      139 000 $ - 13 900 $ (crédit d'achat de 10%) = 125 100 $ taxes incluses
       
      2cc à partir de
      200 000 $ - 20 000 $ (crédit d'achat 10%) = 180 000 $ taxes incluses
       
      3cc à partir de
      227 900 $ - 22 790 $ (crédit d'achat 10%) = 205 110 $ taxes incluses
       
      [/img]
       

       
      http://www.shdm.org/acces_condos/fr/projet_fiche.php?projet_id=174