Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Et oui, quel meilleur jour que le Le jour de la Terre pour remettre les pendules à l'heure sur l'alarmisme relié au réchauffement planétaire.

 

L'alarmisme sur le réchauffement planétaire est la plus grande arnaque de l'histoire et il distrait des vrais problèmes. Si on pouvait donner l'argent dépenser sur les études sur le réchauffement de la planète aux malades en Afrique, on aurait beaucoup moins de problèmes...

 

Vu que ça fait quoi 10 ans maintenant que la témpérature moyenne est en baisse, plusieurs catastrophistes ont changé l'appelation du réchauffement planétaire pour changement climatique. Comme ça, en disant changement climatique, ils peuvent blâmer à peu près n'importe quoi sur ça tandis qu'ils étaient limité avant avec le terme réchauffement planétaire.

 

Donc pour amuser les catastrophistes/environmentatistes qui nous en passent une bonne, voici quelques citations et liens utiles. SVP argumentez intélligement. Dire des choses comme 'Flat-earthers', payé par Bush, etc, sont insultante et abaissent le niveau de la conversation. Aussi, dire que le débat est terminé est complètement ridicule car il n'a jamais même commencé. Dire que tout les scientifiques sont en accord est aussi un méthode totalitaire qui ne sert à rien pour avance la discussion.

 

 

 

“I am a skeptic…Global warming has become a new religion.” - Nobel Prize Winner for Physics, Ivar Giaever.

 

“Since I am no longer affiliated with any organization nor receiving any funding, I can speak quite frankly….As a scientist I remain skeptical.” - Atmospheric Scientist Dr. Joanne Simpson, the first woman in the world to receive a PhD in meteorology and formerly of NASA who has authored more than 190 studies and has been called “among the most preeminent scientists of the last 100 years.”

 

Warming fears are the “worst scientific scandal in the history…When people come to know what the truth is, they will feel deceived by science and scientists.” - UN IPCC Japanese Scientist Dr. Kiminori Itoh, an award-winning PhD environmental physical chemist.

 

“The IPCC has actually become a closed circuit; it doesn’t listen to others. It doesn’t have open minds… I am really amazed that the Nobel Peace Prize has been given on scientifically incorrect conclusions by people who are not geologists,” - Indian geologist Dr. Arun D. Ahluwalia at Punjab University and a board member of the UN-supported International Year of the Planet.

 

“The models and forecasts of the UN IPCC "are incorrect because they only are based on mathematical models and presented results at scenarios that do not include, for example, solar activity.” - Victor Manuel Velasco Herrera, a researcher at the Institute of Geophysics of the National Autonomous University of Mexico

 

“It is a blatant lie put forth in the media that makes it seem there is only a fringe of scientists who don’t buy into anthropogenic global warming.” - U.S Government Atmospheric Scientist Stanley B. Goldenberg of the Hurricane Research Division of NOAA.

 

“Even doubling or tripling the amount of carbon dioxide will virtually have little impact, as water vapour and water condensed on particles as clouds dominate the worldwide scene and always will.” – . Geoffrey G. Duffy, a professor in the Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering of the University of Auckland, NZ.

 

“After reading [uN IPCC chairman] Pachauri's asinine comment [comparing skeptics to] Flat Earthers, it's hard to remain quiet.” - Climate statistician Dr. William M. Briggs, who specializes in the statistics of forecast evaluation, serves on the American Meteorological Society's Probability and Statistics Committee and is an Associate Editor of Monthly Weather Review.

 

“For how many years must the planet cool before we begin to understand that the planet is not warming? For how many years must cooling go on?" - Geologist Dr. David Gee the chairman of the science committee of the 2008 International Geological Congress who has authored 130 plus peer reviewed papers, and is currently at Uppsala University in Sweden.

 

“Gore prompted me to start delving into the science again and I quickly found myself solidly in the skeptic camp…Climate models can at best be useful for explaining climate changes after the fact.” - Meteorologist Hajo Smit of Holland, who reversed his belief in man-made warming to become a skeptic, is a former member of the Dutch UN IPCC committee.

 

“Many [scientists] are now searching for a way to back out quietly (from promoting warming fears), without having their professional careers ruined.” - Atmospheric physicist James A. Peden, formerly of the Space Research and Coordination Center in Pittsburgh.

 

“Creating an ideology pegged to carbon dioxide is a dangerous nonsense…The present alarm on climate change is an instrument of social control, a pretext for major businesses and political battle. It became an ideology, which is concerning.” - Environmental Scientist Professor Delgado Domingos of Portugal, the founder of the Numerical Weather Forecast group, has more than 150 published articles.

 

“CO2 emissions make absolutely no difference one way or another….Every scientist knows this, but it doesn’t pay to say so…Global warming, as a political vehicle, keeps Europeans in the driver’s seat and developing nations walking barefoot.” - Dr. Takeda Kunihiko, vice-chancellor of the Institute of Science and Technology Research at Chubu University in Japan.

 

“The [global warming] scaremongering has its justification in the fact that it is something that generates funds.” - Award-winning Paleontologist Dr. Eduardo Tonni, of the Committee for Scientific Research in Buenos Aires and head of the Paleontology Department at the University of La Plata. # #

 

In addition, the report will feature new peer-reviewed scientific studies and analyses refuting man-made warming fears and a heavy dose of inconvenient climate developments. (See Below: Study: Half of warming due to Sun! –Sea Levels Fail to Rise? - Warming Fears in 'Dustbin of History')

 

(source: http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Minority.Blogs&ContentRecord_id=2158072E-802A-23AD-45F0-274616DB87E6)

 

Aussi, quelques vidéos:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3309910462407994295&ei=8pnvScacC5GErQKX98jnCA&q=global+warming+swindle

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7222900952011147196&ei=8pnvScacC5GErQKX98jnCA&q=global+warming+swindle

 

Citations du fondateur de 'The Weather Channel': ‘Greatest Scam in History

(http://icecap.us/index.php/go/joes-blog/comments_about_global_warming/)

 

Il y en as-tu assez?

 

Maintenant on comprends pourquoi Al Gore refuse systématiquement de participer à un débat sur le sujet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 340
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

There is evidence on both sides of the coin.

 

However, scientists are almost unanimous in agreeing that global warming is real and is caused by man (or at least accelerated by man).

 

I would rather trust scientists over fringe conspiracy theorists.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is evidence on both sides of the coin.

 

However, scientists are almost unanimous in agreeing that global warming is real and is caused by man (or at least accelerated by man).

 

I would rather trust scientists over fringe conspiracy theorists.

 

Where are your statistics on the consensus that global warming is caused by man?

 

31000 scientists signed this: http://www.petitionproject.org/ Can there really be this many fringe conspiracy theorists? At least these are all scientists as opposed to the UN IPCC panel which consists of many politicians who have an agenda rather than credible knowledge of environmental sciences.

 

I do not dispute that the planet has increased by 1 degree over the last hundred years and I am not against action on the environment. But please, who cares about the one degree? The medieval warm period was something like 10 degrees warmer than today and it was a time of much prosperity.

 

What I am against is all the lies of course, but worse is the incredible amounts of money and time wasted on fixing a problem that isn't a problem. Pollution and waste is a problem, but CO2 levels are definitely not a problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Et l'Arctique qui réduit à une vitesse incroyable, ça ne te dis rien??

 

Ça c'est un phénomène très intéressant mais quand même simple à expliquer. Ça s'appele le printemps. Lorsque le printemps (et l'été) arrive, il y a un réchauffement qui se passe et c'est là que la glace commence à fondre. L'effet inverse se passe à l'automne (et l'hiver). C'est un phénomène qui se passe à chaque année.

 

Pour ce qui est de l'antartique, une grande partie de ce continent à en fait refroidi pendant plusieurs années. Il y a une partie qui réchauffent et même un gros morceau qui s'est détaché. Mais malheureusement pour vous, ce n'est pas l'humain qui a cuasé ça mais plutôt les volcans sousmarin actif. Mais ça les médias propagandistes te le diront pas.

 

De toute façon, qu'est que ça cause comme problème s'il n'y avait plus de glace sur ces continents au juste?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ça c'est un phénomène très intéressant mais quand même simple à expliquer. Ça s'appele le printemps. Lorsque le printemps (et l'été) arrive, il y a un réchauffement qui se passe et c'est là que la glace commence à fondre. L'effet inverse se passe à l'automne (et l'hiver). C'est un phénomène qui se passe à chaque année.

 

 

Nonnn......pas pour vrai? Wow t'es brillant. À la place de dire n'importe quoi regarde ça.arctic_sst_anomaly.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

En fait, une seule irruption importante d'un volcan crachera plus de CO2 dans l'atmosphère que toute l'activité humaine pour des années.

 

Wrong.

 

That's a proven myth.

 

"One decent-sized volcanic eruption puts more CO2 in the atmosphere than a decade of human emissions. It's ridiculous to think reducing human CO2 emissions will have any effect."

 

Answer: Not only is this false, it couldn't possibly be true given the CO2 record from any of the dozens of sampling stations around the globe. If it were true that individual volcanic eruptions dominated human emissions and were causing the rise in CO2 concentrations, then these CO2 records would be full of spikes -- one for each eruption. Instead, such records show a smooth and regular trend.

 

The fact of the matter is, the sum total of all CO2 out-gassed by active volcanoes amounts to about 1/150th of anthropogenic emissions."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nonnn......pas pour vrai? Wow t'es brillant. À la place de dire n'importe quoi regarde ça.arctic_sst_anomaly.jpg

 

Ailles c'est bon ton image. Ça représente très bien ou le volcan est et pourquoi qu'il y a tellement de chaleur tout d'un coup. Je pense pas que le fait que je conduis un auto sur Tashereau a affecter la pointe sud seulement et d'un manière tellement drastique.

 

Aussi, ton graphique représente bien le changement normal de la température d'année en année.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




×
×
  • Create New...