SupremeMTL

Montreal's focus for the 2020's

Montreal's focus for the 2020's  

85 members have voted

  1. 1. What do you think should be the city of Montreal's primary focus in the coming decade?

    • Traffic Reduction
      2
    • Public Transit Expansion
      60
    • Highway Expansion / Construction
      1
    • Finding a solution for unused projects/ buildings (Olympic Stadium, Mirabel Airport, Hippodrome, Silo #5)
      9
    • Adding more parks / green spaces
      6
    • Building more bridges / tunnels between Montreal - Laval - North Shore - South Shore
      4
    • Helping the homeless / Reducing Homelessness
      0
    • Something else not mentioned here
      2
    • I don't care
      1


Recommended Posts

Hello everyone, 

I have posted a poll just to get the general sense on what fellow Montrealers think is the greatest issue plaguing the city that should be addressed in the coming decade. 

I would like to know your opinions, and i think that this would be a fun hypothetical discussion as there are no guarantees the city will do anything to address any of the issues mentioned in the poll. 

If i have missed any issues you felt were important or needed to be in the poll please feel free to talk about them below. 

Enjoy!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I voted for "finding solutions for unused projects" but the problem is that for several of the ones you mentioned they are either totally out of the scope of the city (e.g. Mirabel) or at least partially out of scope (Olympic Stadium - provincial, Silos - Federal/Port). The greatest issue facing MTL is that they are limited in what they can do when it comes to these areas. They are often at the mercy of the Provincial or Federal governments. Coderre tried to get MTL recognized as "la metropole" but not sure if that has given us any tangible benefits so far...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I picked adding green spaces even though many of the issues you listed could be a primary focus.. With climate change the city is only going to get hotter as time passes and we will need to find ways to cool off.. trees and parks are one of the best ways to do it plus they bring all the benefits of nature and comfort and make the city more liveable..

Edited by caribb

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, go_habs_go said:

I voted for "finding solutions for unused projects" but the problem is that for several of the ones you mentioned they are either totally out of the scope of the city (e.g. Mirabel) or at least partially out of scope (Olympic Stadium - provincial, Silos - Federal/Port). The greatest issue facing MTL is that they are limited in what they can do when it comes to these areas. They are often at the mercy of the Provincial or Federal governments. Coderre tried to get MTL recognized as "la metropole" but not sure if that has given us any tangible benefits so far...

Yes i agree with you that the city is often handcuffed with their options, if you look just recently Heritage Canada is fighting tooth and nail to keep Silo #5 even though it keeps getting broken into and vandalized and is an eyesore to look at from the waterfront. However, what the city of Montreal can do is propose solutions to the Federal and Provincial governments in hopes that something will be done instead of just sitting there and doing nothing as the Olympic Stadium keeps costing tax payers millions of dollars to run every year with no tenant.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, caribb said:

I picked adding green spaces even though many of the issues you listed could be a primary focus.. With climate change the city is only going to get hotter as time passes and we will need to find ways to cool off.. trees and parks are one of the best ways to do it plus they bring all the benefits of nature and comfort and make the city more liveable..

Yes good point, the reason i have it as an option is because the only "parks" downtown that we have are Square Victoria and Dorchester Square and the only parks opening in the near future that i know of are in Griffintown. With the real estate boom in full force, and old parking lots being converted to tall glass towers, there will be less and less opportunities to make parks. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Most of these issues are regional issues, not only city of Montreal issues.

Better traffic management is what we need, change streetlights configurations when side streets are closed for events or road works would do wonder in reducing traffic in certain parts of the city, make infrastructure work more intensive, at some point we should ask ourselves, should we close completely that stretch of street and do all the work in less time or keep going as it is of doing it part by part and changing configurations weekly?

Highway construction, yes we need to keep our infrastructure up to date, since public transit are using those highways, make them safer and reduce bottleneck due to outdated configurations, expansion, maybe in certain areas that experienced growth, but also use those expansions as springboards for better public transit. 

Do we need more public transit, yes, but maybe to rethink how it works in the region and improve on what we have, when you look at it, how do you want to reduce the use of cars, especially in more suburban areas, when you cannot go easily and frequently from Longueuil to Candiac, or  Laval to Boisbriand which are right across from each other! As long as people cannot travel easily other than to/from downtown, people won't stop buying cars!

Park? In newer residential/mixed used area like griffintown yes, downtown, no new parks needed, make streets greener by using better varieties of trees and plants, more of them where possible, but we do have plenty of parks in central areas (much more than only the 2 you mentioned)

All of what I wrote are just examples of issues/thinking points in those subjects and definitely not an exhaustive list!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would suggest ensuring that Montreal remains relatively affordable, as I think that's one of our best objective competitive advantages in terms of attracting and retaining talent. 

A lot of cities offer good opportunities combined with a good quality of life. It's somewhat subjective in that regard. But many other cities are ridiculously expensive to live in to the point where the amenities they offer just aren't good enough to justify the cost of living. Let's make sure Montreal doesn't go down that path. 

Edited by rufus96

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Il y a 9 heures, WestAust a dit :

Most of these issues are regional issues, not only city of Montreal issues.

Precisely, but then these are arguably the most critical.  Unless (they are) properly addressed, much of what the City of Montreal can do within her boundaries would be just slightly better than futile (or, if I want to be a little more generous: limited in scope).  The rest of the metropolitan area is too important to be ignored.  Thankfully, through the Montreal Metropolitan Community (MMC), more commonly known under the French name Communauté Métropolitaine de Montréal (CMM), the City is able to exert significant influence in planning and development over the whole area, although the boundaries of the latter fail to incorporate some outlying towns which are functionally parts of the metro area as defined by StatCan.

There are still other important issues which fall under the responsabilities of either the provincial or the federal government.  On many of these, the City can have a say (through lobbying), and on a few selected ones, it can even negotiate arrangements enabling it to act as a delivery agent (with some discretionary powers) .

On the other hand, purely local issues can be dealt with advantageously by the Boroughs (Arrondissements).  The City administration proper is responsible for issues concerning the whole City or at least more than a single Arrondissement.

In further discussions, it would be fine if proper distinctions were made as to which administrative level/jurisdiction is concerned.  Alternatively, priorities could be spelled out in general terms --i.e. regardless of who is in charge, as long as the "goods are delivered", but in this case, one needs to assume that the "level" in charge has the means required for implementation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Montreal devrait songer a désenclaver St-Michel par exemple passer une rue qui traverserait la carrière Miron pour rejoindre Papineau.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Finding a solution for unused projects/ buildings 

Est-ce que ça inclus aussi les églises ?

Si c'est le cas alors je donne la deuxième priorité à ce point.

Ma priorité numéro un restant le transport public.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Similar Content

    • By felixinx
      À compter du 25 mars 2019, l'horaire des trains exo5 et exo6 sera modifié pour permettre la construction du REM dans le tunnel du Mont-Royal. La voie sera alors simple de la jonction de l'est jusque dans le tunnel (j'imagine à la Gare Centrale car je ne pense pas qu'il y a d'autres aiguillages dans le tunnel).
      Plus de détails : https://exo.quebec/fr/service-clientele/avis#36294469 - https://rem.info/fr/actualites/ligne-deux-montagnes-hiver-2019
      exo5 - Modification 6 départs exo6 - Modification de presque tous les départs exo6 - Annulation d'un départ direction Montréal en PM exo6 - Vendredi - Annulation d'un départ supplémentaire direction Montréal en PM, annulation d'un départ en PM vers Deux-Montagnes. exo6 - Changement des numéros des trains
      Les gares Mont-Royal et Canora deviendront une seule gare, entre les deux! Les trains rouleront aussi sur la voie qui était enfouie, du côte ouest, pour permettre la construction du côté est.
      Les mesures d'atténuations de janvier 2020 seront annoncés bientôt.
    • By nephersir7
      Il semble que depuis la fin 2014, Montréal est en train d'explorer la possibilité de recouvrir l'autoroute Décarie dans le secteur Namur/De la Savane. Il y aurait au moins 2 hypothèses à l'étude. L'étendue de ce potentiel recouvrement n'est pas mentionnée.
       
       
      http://www.seao.ca/OpportunityPublication/ConsulterAvis/DuJour?ItemId=1a3f81aa-ccb1-4046-9821-9ffa7f0254e2
    • By greenlobster
      The reason of this  new subect is in english is that it concerns a company not from France . One of the top 10 ten Europen IT companies will build a new IT megacenter for North America in, notre belle ville de Montréal, annonce debut 2019. 1600 empois sur 5 ans .Ils construrions une centre de donnéesNord Americain de plus de 400 millions , oui dans lz region de Montréal. 
    • By monctezuma
      Voie réservée sur PIE-IX


       
       
       
       
       
       
       
    • By ScarletCoral
      Article dans la Gazette concernant l'achalandage dans les autobus
      Voir l'article pour l'achalandage par ligne de 2012 à 2018
      https://montrealgazette.com/news/local-news/despite-problems-bus-ridership-in-montreal-up-slightly-in-2018
      Despite problems, bus ridership in Montreal up slightly in 2018
      Passenger numbers are still far short of those from 2012 as complaints soar and punctuality hits its lowest mark since 2001.
      JASON MAGDER, MONTREAL GAZETTE 
      Updated: September 30, 2019
       
      Punctuality plunged, a record number of vehicles were parked for repairs and complaints soared to record levels — and yet, Montreal’s transit authority saw a slight increase in bus ridership last year.
      There were 637,908 more trips taken on city buses in 2018 compared with the year before — an increase of 0.28 per cent.
      It was the first time since 2013 that bus ridership grew.
      The figures, obtained through an access-to-information request, show 142 of 220 bus lines saw an increase in passengers.
      And yet, 2018 was a trying one for the Société de transport de Montréal.
      Because of a labour crisis in the maintenance department, an average of 1,341 buses out of a fleet of 1,807 were available for morning and afternoon peak periods.
      That represents the lowest number in a decade, and far less than the 1,424 required to deliver full service.
      The number of complaints soared by 32 per cent, and the on-time rate of buses was a meagre 79.5 per cent — the lowest since 2001, according to statistics from the STM’s website.
      The year was also marked by buses running out of fuel in record numbers while on the road.
      Despite the uptick in ridership, the numbers fall short of those from 2012. Since that time, 33.9 million fewer annual trips were recorded, accounting for a 13-per-cent overall decline.
      The increase in ridership for 2018 was surprising to Nick Chaloux, a transportation planner and former researcher at TRAM — Transportation Research at McGill.
      “The fact there is a slight growth is positive,” said Chaloux, who published a paper last year that highlighted concerns about the decline in the STM’s bus service.
      “The STM was operating with 100 fewer buses on average, with all the side effects that come with that. When you take that into consideration and you see that ridership was stagnant overall, that’s kind of impressive.”
      Sarah V. Doyon, the director of the transit lobby Trajectoire Québec, said her group was not surprised.
      “We’re finding that people are making more sustainable choices, both for the environment and because congestion is so heavy that public transit is seen as an efficient mode of transportation,” she said.
      It helps that the STM has been working to add more reserved bus lanes throughout its network, Doyon added.
      As for the record number of complaints and high number of late buses, Doyon speculated congestion played a role as buses get stuck in traffic just like cars.
      STM spokesperson Philippe Déry concurred, saying the agency is happy more Montrealers chose to take the bus during a trying year marked by major roadwork and traffic congestion.
      Déry said several measures were put in place to improve performance, including creating two new bus lines to serve the Rivière-des-Prairies and Griffintown sectors, and the merging of bus lines No. 19 with and 53 in the Ahuntsic-Cartierville borough.
      Altogether, the STM offered 68.9 million hours of service in 2018 — a 0.5 per cent increase from the year before, Déry said.
      Last spring, STM chairperson Philippe Schnobb admitted 2018 had been a difficult year and said the bus network was plagued by a deliberate slowdown by unionized employees during a labour conflict.
      In February, during a hearing of Quebec’s workplace tribunal, the STM blamed the union for a record number of buses parked in the garage for repairs.

      Breaking down the STM data by bus line, nine out of the 10 most-travelled routes continued to see ridership declines in 2018.
      Only the 51 Édouard-Montpetit line saw a 1.98 per cent increase in its ridership. That increase was enough to make it the only route in the top 10 to gain riders in the period covered by the data, from 2012 to 2018.
      Over that time, five of the 10 most-travelled buses saw declines of 20 per cent or more: the 69 Gouin, 139 Pie-IX, 121 Sauvé/Côte-Vertu, 165 Côte-des-Neiges and 67 Saint-Michel.
      The most-travelled bus is the 141 Jean-Talon Est, with 8.2 million trips recorded in 2018.
      The 51 Édouard-Montpetit was the second-most travelled bus with 7.7 million trips.
      The 161 Van Horne, the 18 Beaubien and the 24 Sherbrooke round out the top 10, and all saw declines of between one and 13 per cent.