ville-marie Solstice - 44 étages

[Nico83]

Il y a 19 heures, Matt a dit :

On parle du lancement des ventes ou de la construction? J ai comme un doute

Ouverture des ventes pour le grand public.

 

[nephersir7]

Il y a 16 heures, mcgill101 a dit :

2 years from construction to delivery? That seems unrealistic. 

Printemps 2019 -> Fin 2021 = 30-32 mois.

TDC2, juillet 2016:

Le 2016-07-22 à 19:49, budgebandit a dit :

Piling has begun! Pictures taken on July 22nd 2016

 

 

 

TDC2, 30 mois plus tard:

[nephersir7]

 

[whitefishboy]

So is it 147m + base or 147 on top of the base (that would be about 12 m) giving 159 m total. Can never be sure without elevation diagrams. In the first pic of the header, it looks like the base does not factor in the total height since the tower has pillars on the left which would be included as part of the total height of 147m. 

[Matt]

Il y a 6 heures, whitefishboy a dit :

So is it 147m + base or 147 on top of the base (that would be about 12 m) giving 159 m total. Can never be sure without elevation diagrams. In the first pic of the header, it looks like the base does not factor in the total height since the tower has pillars on the left which would be included as part of the total height of 147m. 

Effectvement, ce genre de document prete a confusion... si on veut rester dans une syntaxe de la phrase c est un basiliaire de 4 etage dont on rajoute une tour de 147m. 

[Djentmaster001]

It's been confirmed as 147-147.5m for months now, city documents are confusing because of their sentence structure. Just like with 1000 De la Montagne where it's 144m but the documents said 173m accounting the elevation. 

[Decel]

il y a 3 minutes, Djentmaster001 a dit :

It's been confirmed as 147-147.5m for months now, city documents are confusing because of their sentence structure. Just like with 1000 De la Montagne where it's 144m but the documents said 173m accounting the elevation. 

It's as if it was written in Troll 😆

[Fortier]

Il y a 9 heures, whitefishboy a dit :

So is it 147m + base or 147 on top of the base (that would be about 12 m) giving 159 m total. Can never be sure without elevation diagrams. In the first pic of the header, it looks like the base does not factor in the total height since the tower has pillars on the left which would be included as part of the total height of 147m. 

 

Il y a 2 heures, Matt a dit :

Effectvement, ce genre de document prete a confusion... si on veut rester dans une syntaxe de la phrase c est un basiliaire de 4 etage dont on rajoute une tour de 147m. 

Guys, on ne le répétera jamais assez, dans les documents de la Ville, quand ils disent la hauteur de la tour, c'est toujours la hauteur totale. Ces documents ne demandent pas au lecteur de faire de calculs savants.

C'est bien une tour de 147m avec un basilaire de 4 étages!

[Windex]

1 minute ago, Fortier said:

Guys, on ne le répétera jamais assez, dans les documents de la Ville, quand ils disent la hauteur de la tour, c'est toujours la hauteur totale. Ces documents ne demandent pas au lecteur de faire de calculs savants.

Je crois que c'est la même chose au 455 RL, on ne devrait pas additionner le basilaire à la tour, mais bon, on verra.

[WindGuy]

Can anyone show me where I can find the city proposals page for this project and similar ones? I am interested in finding the pedestrian level wind studies for this project and other ones like it.