Recommended Posts

The Edmonton Journal‘s editorialists, meanwhile, aren’t so sure about the government’s plans for the Senate at all. “With the current arrangement that gives Ontario and Quebec each as many Senate seats as the whole of the West, elections in the long run would surely be bad news for anyone who believes a period of majority Conservative rule is a good idea,” they argue. And they worry newly empowered, provincially elected Senators could very well usurp the legislatures as “the true spokesmen of their provinces.”

 

The Canadian Union of Postal Workers having helpfully warned us of the prospect of a strike in case we’re planning on paying an important bill, the Calgary Herald‘s editorialists offer a “news flash”: “Most people don’t mail bill payments anymore. They pay by phone or bank online, in an instant, and colloquially refer to the product the unionized workers deliver as ‘snail mail.’” Actually, we refer to that product as “garbage,” because that’s what 95% of it (in our case) is. Now, some Canadians would of course be seriously affected by a postal strike — only vastly fewer than, say, 15 years ago. As the Herald says, CUPW has much less bargaining power than it seems to think.

 

“The very notion of a national mail strike is little short of insane,” Jay Bryan writes, entertainingly, in the Gazette. Unreliable and slow at the best of times, Canada Post is, he says, “a constant drag on this country’s productivity even when it’s operating normally.” It’s painfully obvious that we need some kind of privatization or competition to shake the organization out of its torpor — or at least, we’d add, the threat of such upheaval. What say you, new Conservative overlords?

 

Seriously, do people even realize how fast the mail is in, say, the United Kingdom? A first-class letter costs 46p — about 75¢ — and is expected to arrive anywhere in the land the next day. Including Saturday. Yes, Canada is much bigger than Great Britain. But Great Britain’s not bigger than, say, Toronto.

 

National Post

[email protected]

 

LMAO the letter arrived in ENGLAND :rotfl:

 

Opinion: We need competition in mail delivery

 

 

By JAY BRYAN, The Gazette May 31, 2011 Be the first to post a comment

 

 

 

Story

Photos ( 1 )

 

 

In implementing its modernized methods of sorting and delivering mail, part of the corporation’s transformation project, Canada Post has been facing resistance from employees in Winnipeg, the first city to operate under the new “two-bundle” system.

 

In implementing its modernized methods of sorting and delivering mail, part of the corporation’s transformation project, Canada Post has been facing resistance from employees in Winnipeg, the first city to operate under the new “two-bundle” system.

Photograph by: Don Healy/Postmedia News, Don Healy/Postmedia News

 

With a postal strike possible as of midnight Thursday, it's high time for our federal government to wake up and reform Canada Post, an organization that's a constant drag on this country's productivity even when it's operating normally.

 

We need competition in mail delivery, a reform that has paid large dividends in countries all over the world.

 

Meanwhile, in Canada, the cost to mail a first-class letter has been shooting up much faster than the rate of inflation, while the quality of service remains as poor as ever.

 

At my home, we're regularly reminded of this as we receive a stream of outdated, mangled magazines and at least a few letters each year that are clearly addressed to people on other streets.

 

The real eye-opener for me came a few years ago when a son had two university applications lost, both sent at high cost by Canada Post's premium courier service.

 

The first, to a university in California, simply never arrived. Only a compassionate admissions officer allowed a replacement to be sent in late.

We gained an inkling of what might have gone wrong when a second application, this one to an institution in Boston, showed up at the shop of a watchmaker in the British city of Bristol. Yes, you read correctly: it was delivered not only to the wrong address, but the wrong continent.

 

The watchmaker noticed that the original address label had been covered by a different one, perhaps one that fell off its original package and was replaced carelessly. He was kind enough to forward the document.

 

These are just one family's anecdotes, of course, but it wouldn't be hard to gather more like them. It's bad enough that delivery in this country is slow, but when it's this unreliable, you have to wonder why the supposedly reform-minded Harper government doesn't seem to have any plans for improvement.

 

The current labour wrangle is an excellent example of the kind of trouble we're courting by maintaining the Canada Post monopoly on delivering letters. The very notion of a national mail strike is little short of insane.

 

After all, both Canada Post and its union are living on borrowed time. Email and other forms of digital document delivery are steadily eroding its business.

 

You might assume that managers and workers, both threatened, would try to preserve their jobs by working furiously to deliver the mail faster, cheaper and more reliably.

 

Of course, you would be wrong. That's because government-owned monopolies don't have to care about customers: they're immortal and immune to market pressures.

 

Happily, it's easy to come up with a better idea for mail delivery.

 

Others have done it for us. Countries around the world have been opening mail delivery to competition for decades, with excellent results.

 

One can now find competitive mail delivery services or privatized post offices - sometimes both - in Sweden, Finland, Germany, Austria, the Netherlands and New Zealand.

 

A couple of researchers at the Montreal Economic Institute, Vincent Geloso and Youri Chassin, are the latest of many economists to conclude that opening up mail delivery to competition would bring major economic benefits to Canada.

 

This would go far beyond getting your letters to you faster.

 

Even with the decline of snail mail, it remains an important service for businesses, which will be hit badly by a mail strike and can expect continuing productivity losses if Canada Post isn't reformed.

 

An obvious benefit of competition is that Canadians would no longer be able to be held hostage to disputes between postal workers and management.

 

If there were competition, the normal rules of labour negotiations would apply, with both sides acutely aware that a strike would drive customers elsewhere, threatening lost union jobs and perhaps some changes in the management suite.

 

Other normal rules of business behaviour would also begin to be felt.

 

The impulse to hike postal rates would be offset by the knowledge that competitors would take this as an opportunity to undercut Canada Post. Lost or damaged mail would be a reason to abandon Canada Post in favour of some other delivery service.

 

The advantages, in fact, are so obvious that virtually every informed analysis of Canada Post in recent years has recommended competition and/or privatization.

 

This includes recommendations by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, the C.D. Howe Research Institute, former Canada Post boss Michael Warren and, most recently, the Montreal Economic Institute.

 

The Institutes's report found that in countries that had introduced competition, and sometimes privatization, productivity improved dramatically, permitting good service with significant cost savings.

 

er? So how about it, Mr. Harp-

 

Haven't Canadians suffered enough?

 

The full MEI report can be found at http://www.iedm.org/files/note0511_en.pdf

 

[email protected]

© Copyright © The Montreal Gazette

 

Read more: http://www.montrealgazette.com/business/Opinion+need+competition+mail+delivery/4865226/story.html#ixzz1NxjHjzgQ

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If they do go on strike, I hope it wont be long. Seeing I lost my credit card and it takes 6-9 business days and my next VISA bill is June 11th. If I don't pay by the end of June, Canada Post will be paying my Visa bill.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If they do go on strike, I hope it wont be long. Seeing I lost my credit card and it takes 6-9 business days and my next VISA bill is June 11th. If I don't pay by the end of June, Canada Post will be paying my Visa bill.

 

oh no, they will not be paying your Visa do not get confused, you will get fucked, but The Union is never wrong :D You might want to call around, your new VISA card may well be on a slow boat to Nigeria or possibly France at the moment :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Je sais pas si ça va être comme ça pour Montréal et la rive-sud, mais j'ai lis dans le journal hier qu'il parlait de seulement distribuer le courrier les lundi, mercredi et vendredi...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Similar Content

    • By ProposMontréal
      Ahead: A brighter horizon for Cabot Square
      Plans due; Downtown area in search of an identity
       
      Source: The Gazette
       
      Cty councillor Karim Boulos is standing in the Canadian Centre for Architecture, airing his optimism over a scale model of what is known as "the Cabot Square area" - a part of the Peter McGill district he represents.
       
      But the Cabot Square area is also a stretch of Ste. Catherine St. that makes many Montrealers wince.
       
      The thoroughfare between Lambert Closse and Chomedey Sts. has been this city's version of a picture of Dorian Gray, a pastiche of boarded-up storefronts, crumbling facades and grafitti that seems to have spread while other neighbourhoods renewed themselves.
       
      However, by this time next Monday, Boulos and the rest of the city will get a bigger glimpse of what might happen to the piece of downtown that's been in search of an identity for nearly a generation. That's when three teams of architects and urban planners will submit their versions of what should be done to revive the Cabot Square area.
       
      Boulos, Ville Marie borough mayor Benoit Labonté and members of an alliance of neighbourhood businesses and residents met the press yesterday to detail the attempts to revitalize the neighbourhood.
       
      The planning teams were formed after a collection of 25 business, property owners and residents' associations started the Table de concertation du centre-ville ouest.
       
      "The properties may be empty but the owners are still paying taxes," Boulos said. "They haven't left, they're waiting to see what's going to happen."
       
      The plans submitted by the teams will be judged by a jury that includes architect and Harvard professor Joan Busquest, Dinu Bumbaru of Heritage Montreal and founding director Phyllis Lambert of the Canadian Centre for Architecture.
       
      The successful submission will form the basis for an urban plan that will produced by the borough and submitted to public consultations.
       
      Boulos suggests that if everything goes well, changes in the district might begin "by this fall."
       
      And for Lambert, whose architectural centre sprawls across the neighbourhood's southern edge, change is what's needed for a district that spent decades losing more than it's gained.
       
      "Over the last years, this area has deteriorated miserably," she said. "There used to be the Forum and all those stores where the Faubourg (Ste. Catherine) is. ... But it just goes down the drain further and further.
       
      "Then there's the block ... just to the east of the Forum with the (Seville) theatre on it, which has been boarded up for years.
       
      "And this just destroys the whole area. People have no respect (for the neighbourhood), and why would you? People just walk down the street and it's so miserable."
       
      Lambert's nephew, Stephen Bronfman, is chairman of Claridge Inc., an investment company that owns the Seville Theatre block.
       
      Asked in October about the condition of the block, Lambert told The Gazette: "It is coming along. Slowly, but we are working closely with the city and other landlords in the area. It takes time to do properly."
       
      Labonté says a development project for the Seville block is under study by the borough's urban committee. Boulos has said in earlier interviews that a private investor plans to turn the block into student residences.
       
      "What I can tell you about this project," Labonté said, "is that that there will be lots of room for students - especially for Concordia University - and the design of the building will be quite impressive. ... I'm pretty confident this project at the Seville Theatre will start the renewal of this leg of Ste. Catherine St."
       
      A decision by the borough on which development plan will be used is expected in May. But final approval will rest with the city's executive committee.
       
      In the meantime, Montrealers and the people who own the storefronts that make them wince wait to see what's going to happen.
    • By Cataclaw
      Est-ce que le métro devrait être en service la nuit ou est-ce que ça serait une dépense inutile?
    • By jesseps
      The jury members are:

      - Melvin Charney, architect; - Odile Decq, architect and Director of the École Spéciale d'Architecture, Paris; - Jacques Des Rochers, Curator of Canadian Art, Montréal Museum of Fine Arts; - Michel Dionne, architect, Cooper, Robertson & Partners, New York; - Raphaël Fischler, urban planner and professor at the School of Urban Planning, McGill University; - Mario Masson, landscape architect and Division Manager, Service du développement culturel, de la qualité du milieu de vie et de la diversité ethnoculturelle, Ville de Montréal; - Alessandra Ponte, associate professor, School of Architecture, Université de Montréal; - Philippe Poullaouec-Gonidec, landscape architect and holder of the UNESCO Chair in Landscape and Environmental Design at Université de Montréal.
       
      Instructions for prospective entrants
       
       
      (Courtesy of CNW Telbec)
    • By ProposMontréal
      Pas de Camion à Déchets dans le QDS
       
      Source: Spacing Montreal
       

       
      There aren’t going to be any dump trucks blocking up the streets in Montreal’s new Quartier des Spectacles. Last Wednesday, the City approved a proposition to replace public trash cans with receptacles for garbage, recyclables and compostables, all hooked up to an vacuum-powered collection system. Waste placed in each receptacle would be sucked into a network of underground tubes and transported to a central processing location (possibly located in Place Desjardins).
       
      At first glance, this system may seem unduly costly and invasive, not to mention energy intensive. But since the streets in the QDS are already slotted to be ripped up in order to replace ageing sewers, aqueducts and power-lines, throwing in the waste-collection system will only cost an additional $8.2 million (according to a planner who worked on the proposal). Under the new system, garbage collection in the neighborhood would rely on electricity rather than fossil fuels, which may not be a bad idea given the cost and environmental impacts of burning fuel.
       
      Most importantly, the new garbage collection system would also apply to residents and businesses located in the Quartier des Spectacles. For instance, the restaurants in Place Desjardins would be able to be compost food scraps, saving several hundred tons of waste from landfills each year.
       
      Although Montreal is behind cities like Toronto who offer composting for household waste, this initiative would be the first in North America to offer composting on the public domain and for businesses.
       
      ENVAC, the European company that engineers these systems worldwide, built their first trash-vacuuming system in Stockholm in 1961 and it is still in operation (it has an expected lifespan of about 50 years, although that is probably standard for sewers and other infrastructure).
       
      Teaching the hoards of drunken festival-goers and clueless tourists to sort trash from recyclables and organic waste is a challenge for the future…
    • By jesseps
      (Courtesy of Metro Montreal)